<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [dEQP, EGL, HSW] dEQP-EGL.functional.buffer_age.no_preserve fails"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98330#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [dEQP, EGL, HSW] dEQP-EGL.functional.buffer_age.no_preserve fails"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98330">bug 98330</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lemody@gmail.com" title="Tapani Pälli <lemody@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tapani Pälli</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>these tests are skipped on my SKL machine:
"NotSupported (EGL_EXT_buffer_age is not supported at
teglBufferAgeTests.cpp:401)
and fail constantly on HSW machine:
"Fail (Fail, buffer content is not well preserved when age > 0)"
dEQP version on both machines matches:
812d768b55dcedf2c0fda63e69db3c05600f379d
and Mesa as well:
9f0726f3e509c80c78ddb5e7411fa34f676de71d
kernel on SKL is drm-nightly 4.8.0+, HSW has 4.7.9-200.fc24.x86_64. Then on top
of this I have a feeling that this test will behave differently on DRI2 vs DRI3
because of the preserved bit support ...
I'll have to figure out first what is the requirement for EGL_EXT_buffer_age
support to be there.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>