<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Regression: GLB 2.7 & Glmark-2 GLES versions segfault due to linker precision error (259fc505) on dead variable" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97532#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Regression: GLB 2.7 & Glmark-2 GLES versions segfault due to linker precision error (259fc505) on dead variable" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97532">bug 97532</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> Eero Tamminen</a> <pre>(In reply to Mark Janes from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97532#c20">comment #20</a>) > Eero, we talked about this bug in our weekly meeting today, and agreed that > it should be fixed as soon as possible, and put into the 13.0.1 release. > Everyone agreed that your fix was the right thing to do, but that it should > be put behind a drirc option, so regular users benefit without knowing about > an environment variable. > > If you can put your patch behind a drirc option, then it will be reviewed > and merged. If you don't want to do that, we can assign it to someone else. I think that should be done by somebody who has better opinion on what's best place in the compiler side to initialize drirc stuff, and what's the best place to pass the info from there to the linker, than me. Even better would be refactoring all the separate places in Mesa where drirc is initialized sp that it's done only in one place, but that would be a *lot* more work (Martin had some initial patches for that from long ago, but he gave up on it)...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>