<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - >2% perf drop in GfxBench T-Rex with "i965: disable loop unrolling in GLSL IR""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99221#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - >2% perf drop in GfxBench T-Rex with "i965: disable loop unrolling in GLSL IR""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99221">bug 99221</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Eero Tamminen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>SynMark PSPhong case seems similar (worse scheduling and more register bank
conflicts).
In the SynMark PSPom case, fragment shader has two loops of which GLSL IR can
unroll the other, but NIR doesn't unroll either of them.
Should NIR be able to unroll loops with non-integer loop counter, like GLSL IR
did:
------------------------
for (float i = 0.02; i < 0.9; i += 0.11)
maxSh += (texture(normalTex, texCoord + lightRay * i).a - sh0) * (1.0 - i) *
shadowSoftening;
------------------------
?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>