<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Don't print: "Note: Buggy applications may crash, if they do please report to vendor"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99715#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Don't print: "Note: Buggy applications may crash, if they do please report to vendor"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99715">bug 99715</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jason@jlekstrand.net" title="Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>"> Jason Ekstrand</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=129724" name="attach_129724" title="Patch with X11 extension-based heuristic">attachment 129724</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=129724&action=edit" title="Patch with X11 extension-based heuristic">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=99715&attachment=129724'>[review]</a> Patch with X11 extension-based heuristic (In reply to programmerjake from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99715#c6">comment #6</a>) > I found the NV-CONTROL and ATIFGLRXDRI extensions for detecting if the x > server is using the proprietary driver. Does anyone know if you can use radv > with amd catalyst or should I add code to check for both extensions? I think checking for those two extensions and *not* warning if one of them is found sounds like a reasonable thing to do. I have no idea if radv will run on the proprietary AMD X driver but I doubt anyone cares. If you've installed the AMD proprietary X driver, you've probably also installed the proprietary Vulkan driver to go with it. I've attached a patch to do just that. Unfortunately, I lack the systems to test it beyond making sure Intel still works.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>