<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - compilation of WebGL demo iamnop.com/particles shader slowed 5x, run-time perf dropped to 1/10th" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97035#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - compilation of WebGL demo iamnop.com/particles shader slowed 5x, run-time perf dropped to 1/10th" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97035">bug 97035</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> Eero Tamminen</a> <pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97035#c12">comment #12</a>) > Tested latest Mesa. On my SKL GT2 the slow shader still takes ~20s to > compile and produces following Mesa statistics: > SIMD8 shader: 7985 instructions. 0 loops. 57210 cycles. 359:993 > spills:fills. Promoted 19 constants. Compacted 127760 to 86032 bytes (33%) Latest Mesa (i.e. 5 months later) uses 17-18ms to compile on that machine, and gets following statistics: SIMD8 shader: 8127 instructions. 0 loops. 57436 cycles. 369:1019 spills:fills. Promoted 18 constants. Compacted 130032 to 87472 bytes (33%) I.e. there's been a minor improvement in compile time, but regression from v11.2 is still valid and spilling & instruction counts have gotten slightly worse. "perf" output looks same as earlier.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>