<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - Up to 20% perf drop in texture sampling tests with "i965/surface_state: Get the aux usage from the miptree code"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102258#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - Up to 20% perf drop in texture sampling tests with "i965/surface_state: Get the aux usage from the miptree code"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102258">bug 102258</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> Eero Tamminen</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=102258#c4">comment #4</a>) > This is fixed by the following commit in master: > > commit 61d2f3f1c24323a1c067595ec78dfbfefdc72b41 > Author: Jason Ekstrand <<a href="mailto:jason.ekstrand@intel.com">jason.ekstrand@intel.com</a>> > Date: Thu Aug 17 15:27:25 2017 -0700 > > i965/miptree: Return NONE from texture_aux_usage when fully resolved Jason, any idea why the fix would drop GpuTest 0.7 FurMark performance couple of percent, but only on BXT? (I saw it when using 1/2 HD windowed version, when running FurMark in FullHD fullscreen, I wasn't able to bisect it. There's also similar SynMark v7 PSPom drop at the same time, but I wasn't able to bisect it with ezBench. PSPom perf raised with the original <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Should provide empty local.conf file" href="show_bug.cgi?id=3">bug 3</a>-4%, but not FurMark one, that may be due to hashing mode impact on FurMark.)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>