<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Mesa 17.2 no longer can give SRGB-capable framebuffer on i965, even though Mesa 17.1.x does." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102354#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Mesa 17.2 no longer can give SRGB-capable framebuffer on i965, even though Mesa 17.1.x does." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102354">bug 102354</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:lemody@gmail.com" title="Tapani Pälli <lemody@gmail.com>"> Tapani Pälli</a> <pre>(In reply to Deve from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=102354#c13">comment #13</a>) > I tried to make a clean build with current git mesa and your patch to make > sure that I did everything properly, but unfortunately with no luck. You can > see glxinfo log in attachment. > > STK uses glXChooseFBConfig by default and from what I see in the specs after > a quick look: "All attributes in attrib_list, including boolean attributes, > are immediately followed by the corresponding desired value." > > It has a fallback with glXChooseVisual for glx <= 1.2, but tbh. I don't > think that it's used somewhere... ok, I'll do some testing on other machines to see if there is some dependency after all, I don't really understand why your glxinfo does not have any srgb configs listed :/</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>