<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - mesa-18.1: regression with TFP on intel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107117#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - mesa-18.1: regression with TFP on intel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107117">bug 107117</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:fourdan@xfce.org" title="Olivier Fourdan <fourdan@xfce.org>"> Olivier Fourdan</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107117#c3">comment #3</a>) > (In reply to Mark Janes from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107117#c2">comment #2</a>) > > Does this bug require a piglit test, to prevent similar regressions in the > > future? > > Yes, we should either improve the current TFP test to also test GL_RECTANGLE > or turn the test provided here into a piglit test. Oliver, would it be ok > to include that code in piglit under a BSD license? Sure, no problem with me, but it would probably require a bit of cleanup, it's just a quick (and ugly) hack to demonstrate the issue. However, I still see the issue even after applying <a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/237490/">https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/237490/</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>