<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - [GEN9+] 50% perf drop in SynMark Fill* tests (E2E RBC gets disabled?)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107223#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - [GEN9+] 50% perf drop in SynMark Fill* tests (E2E RBC gets disabled?)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107223">bug 107223</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> Eero Tamminen</a> <pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107223#c20">comment #20</a>) > FYI: this series seems to have fixed also earlier perf regression (from > around May) that was visible on GEN6-GEN8 in (unity/compiz) composited > windowed 3D benchmarks, but only with modifier enabled gfxstack. Btw. while it improved a lot of onscreen tests on older GENs too, it dropped perf on older GENs in SynMark ZBuffer & VSInstancing tests which draw a large amount of geometry on top of each other. Apparently caching changed so that (depth?) reads are now more expensive on those older (6-8) GENs?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>