<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [G965] piglit.spec.!opengl 1_2.tex3d-maxsize spins forever"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108630#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [G965] piglit.spec.!opengl 1_2.tex3d-maxsize spins forever"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108630">bug 108630</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jljusten@gmail.com" title="Jordan Justen <jljusten@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jordan Justen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to asimiklit from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108630#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to asimiklit from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108630#c6">comment #6</a>)
> > I investigated why I missed this regression on my local machine despite I
> > checked this patch several times under piglit and found out that this test
> > passes on my machine even with my original patch. So I guess it depends on
> > some additional things.
> >
>
> The updated patch is delayed due to testing problems.</span >
I hope my comment ("It is not specific to g965") is not delaying
things. What I meant is that "in theory" it could happen on any system.
But, due to other factors, we only currently know of a reproducible
case on g965.
So, I would not hold off on re-posting the patch just because you
cannot reproduce the bug on a newer machine.
-Jordan</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>