<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - The big SKQP bug" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105301#c52">Comment # 52</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - The big SKQP bug" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105301">bug 105301</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dongseong.hwang@intel.com" title="Dongseong Hwang <dongseong.hwang@intel.com>"> Dongseong Hwang</a> <pre>(In reply to Kenneth Graunke from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105301#c51">comment #51</a>) > (In reply to Dongseong Hwang from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105301#c50">comment #50</a>) > > In my opinion, Intel has no excuse to Google about this conformance test > > failure, and a major product has been broken. > > Thank you for the analysis. I believe you're correct that we should allow > this. The specs were fairly new when we first implemented this, and there > were very few users, so it makes sense that we'd need to adjust things now > that it's in more widespread use. Thank you. > Please avoid grandstanding about how we're "breaking major products", "have > no excuse", and other implications that we're doing a terrible job. In the > open source world, it only makes people less likely to care about your > problem and listen to you. Thank you. Sorry for bad sentence. As the second English speaker, subtle nuance is always difficult for me. I just translated my language to English. I'll be more careful.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>