<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i965 regressions from EXT_texture_sRGB_R8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108805#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i965 regressions from EXT_texture_sRGB_R8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108805">bug 108805</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:idr@freedesktop.org" title="Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>"> Ian Romanick</a> <pre>(In reply to Gert Wollny from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108805#c2">comment #2</a>) > Given that RGB formats are not required to be renderable, the error state > GL_FRAMEBUFFER_INCOMPLETE_ATTACHMENT should also be legal, and indeed adding > a check for this latter return value turns the output from "Fail" into > "Unsupported", so this actually seems to be a bug in the CTS. No. If it is a potentially valid configuration that is just not supported by the implementation, the correct error is GL_FRAMEBUFFER_UNSUPPORTED. Other errors are only returned in cases where EVERY implementation must return the same error.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>