<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i965 regressions from EXT_texture_sRGB_R8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108805#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - i965 regressions from EXT_texture_sRGB_R8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108805">bug 108805</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mark.a.janes@intel.com" title="Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@intel.com>"> Mark Janes</a> <pre>(In reply to Gert Wollny from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108805#c10">comment #10</a>) > I am very puzzled about the KHR46*rgb32* failures. Now that I was able to > look at the CI results they say (with last nights patch) > > "WARN: this test skipped when it was expected to crash." [1] > > A former result said: > > "WARN: this test crashed as expected." [2] Because the regression was pushed to master, i965 CI was updated to expect these tests to fail. Other developers need to have these failures filtered from their runs. Any CI result other than a failure is highlighted for these tests. In this case, your patch causes the tests to skip once again, and the CI [1] is telling you that you patch addresses this specific regression. On the previous build [2] it tells you that the test is still broken. The problem is that the patch also breaks dEQP tests (dEQP-GLES3*.functional.*) eg: <a href="https://mesa-ci.01.org/majanes/builds/233/group/c6dce6f713f249d0fe352f36285bbbe5">https://mesa-ci.01.org/majanes/builds/233/group/c6dce6f713f249d0fe352f36285bbbe5</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>