<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SKL] [REGRESSION] [BISECTED] [OpenGL CTS] Many flaky tests after adding workarounds for object preemption in gen9" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109357#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SKL] [REGRESSION] [BISECTED] [OpenGL CTS] Many flaky tests after adding workarounds for object preemption in gen9" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109357">bug 109357</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:agomez@igalia.com" title="Andrés Gómez García <agomez@igalia.com>"> Andrés Gómez García</a> <pre>(In reply to Mark Janes from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109357#c4">comment #4</a>) > I haven't seen any flaky tests in this category in Mesa i965 CI. We run the > GL46 variants of the tests, on Linux 4.18. I can confirm that I can reproduce with the GL46 variants of the tests. > Usually SKL and KBL have identical regression patterns, so it is surprising > that you can't reproduce the regression on KBL. Are there differences > between those systems (eg kernel or other sw configuration)? Yeah, weird. Since we use docker, the SW stack is the same, with the exception of the services provided by the host system. Namely, the kernel and X server versions. Additionally, all hour host systems are running Debian Buster but I've actually realized that our KBL is using also Linux 4.18. I'm just now running a pass in the SKL box with the same 4.18 kernel. Let's see what comes out.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>