<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - 4-27% performance drop in Vulkan benchmarks"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109216#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - 4-27% performance drop in Vulkan benchmarks"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109216">bug 109216</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:idr@freedesktop.org" title="Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>"> <span class="fn">Ian Romanick</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109216#c23">comment #23</a>)
<span class="quote">> I'm beginning to think we need to just revert the offending patch on the
> 19.0 branch. There are solutions to the problem but they involve either
> reworking NIR loops to have explicit continue blocks or very tricky
> optimizations. Neither of those (especially not the former) is something
> that I'd be super-excited to back-port.</span >
There is a mostly reviewed MR that I just need to finish. I'm really, sorry
but since I've been back from FOSDEM, I've been very ill. If this was such a
pressing issue for you, you could have also reviewed that patch series when I
sent it out and tagged you on it. :(</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>