<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ir_variable has maximum access out of bounds -- but it's not out of bounds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109532#c24">Comment # 24</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ir_variable has maximum access out of bounds -- but it's not out of bounds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109532">bug 109532</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>""" But according to next comment it should be 0 because of the BlockB[0] was optimized and there is the BlockB[1] only: /* The ARB_shading_language_420pack spec says: * * If the binding identifier is used with a uniform block instanced as * an array then the first element of the array takes the specified * block binding and each subsequent element takes the next consecutive * uniform block binding point. */ """ I don't think that's enough justification for the "mesa" way of doing it. Whether a block is eliminated or not is not specified by GLSL spec. Would be good to get some more experienced opinions on this. [Not mine...]</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>