<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ir_variable has maximum access out of bounds -- but it's not out of bounds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109532#c38">Comment # 38</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ir_variable has maximum access out of bounds -- but it's not out of bounds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109532">bug 109532</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to asimiklit from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109532#c36">comment #36</a>) > Ilia could you please share your thoughts about this solution? > Do you agree with Ian suggestion as to disallow the elimination from the > beginning of the array? > I am asking about it to understand have we consensus as to a direction of > the fix or not. Sounds good to me... I think you can do something like layout(binding=n) foo[6] means that n..n+5 are all taken and assigned to the relevant items. However if you just have "foo[6]", without the explicit binding, you can (and should) eliminate any pre- and post- elements, i.e. before the first and after the last. However if foo[1] and foo[5] are used, then they should be 4 binding points away from one another. Hope that makes sense.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>