<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mark.a.janes@intel.com" title="Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Mark Janes</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [BSW] piglit tests intermittently/randomly fail when running concurrently"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92320">bug 92320</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">See Also</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108787
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [BSW] piglit tests intermittently/randomly fail when running concurrently"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92320#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [BSW] piglit tests intermittently/randomly fail when running concurrently"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92320">bug 92320</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mark.a.janes@intel.com" title="Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Mark Janes</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Mesa i965 CI is not a useful tool for investigating this bug. Sadly, we punted
on this issue 4 years ago, and I have to re-execute all bsw tests that fail at
the end of a CI run, to verify that they did not fail due to this bug.
So every BSW failure reported by CI has in fact failed *twice* in the run.
My expectation is that the platform is not properly enabled, leading to these
instabilities. See <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92320#c6">comment 6</a> in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BSW] Mesa "total_needs <= urb_chunks" abort in GfxBench CarChase startup, when asserts are enabled"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=108787">bug 108787</a>. Perhaps there is some workaround
missing, in addition to the mishandled resource constraint that Ken describes.
BSW has less customer relevance than even SNB, because it did not sell well.
As far as I know, Intel CI is the only source of bugs for the platform, because
no one else has them. I'd love for the bugs to get fixed, but they should
probably be prioritized lower than the bugs that are known to impact customers
(eg 104778).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>