<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Xorg segfault on cpu which does not support PAT" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110774#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Xorg segfault on cpu which does not support PAT" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110774">bug 110774</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ssheribe@redhat.com" title="Snir Sheriber <ssheribe@redhat.com>"> Snir Sheriber</a> <pre>(In reply to Kenneth Graunke from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110774#c5">comment #5</a>) > Sorry, poorly worded. The question is more: should we just require that PAT > be enabled in QEMU order for virtualized graphics to work? Or do we need to > try and support the non-PAT case? I don't know enough about the topic to > know what is reasonable. I think it's not too much of a hassle to require PAT (by default or only when GVTg is used), we can try open an issue asking for that. My use case not really requires this to work in the non-PAT case, I just think it's better to avoid the crashing if possible BTW, it looks like it generally works but crashes when i open firefox, so maybe worth to consider a journal warning/err + still using gtt (which will present destroyed image IIUC)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>