[Bug 67391] [IVB]igt/prime_nv_api cause WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 4095 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:3977 i915_gem_free_object+0xf3/0x19d [i915]()
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Sun Aug 18 11:02:28 PDT 2013
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67391
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Fix merged to dinq:
> >
> > commit 48ca155d15d439d5d035a3daf1c56ed1a30afb17
> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > Date: Thu Aug 8 09:10:37 2013 +0200
> >
> > drm/i915: unpin backing storage in dmabuf_unmap
> >
> > This fixes a WARN in i915_gem_free_object when the
> > obj->pages_pin_count isn't 0.
> >
> > v2: Add locking to unmap, noticed by Chris Wilson. Note that even
> > though we call unmap with our own dev->struct_mutex held that won't
> > result in an immediate deadlock since we never go through the dma_buf
> > interfaces for our own, reimported buffers. But it's still easy to
> > blow up and anger lockdep, but that's already the case with our ->map
> > implementation. Fixing this for real will involve per dma-buf ww mutex
> > locking by the callers. And lots of fun. So go with the duct-tape
> > approach for now.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
> > Tested-by: Armin K. <krejzi at email.com> (v1)
> > Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> The Call Trace issue disappears, but after running it shows:
> Test requirement not met in function main, file prime_nv_api.c:522:
> Test requirement: (intel_fd != -1)
> Test requirement not met in function main, file prime_nv_api.c:523:
> Test requirement: (intel_fd2 != -1)
> DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Bad file descriptor
> Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
> May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
> get chip id failed: -1 [9]
> param: 4, val: 0
> Test assertion failure function main, file prime_nv_api.c:527:
> Failed assertion: bufmgr
> prime_nv_api: drmtest.c:816: igt_fail: Assertion `!test_with_subtests'
> failed.
>
> So do I need to file a new bug?
At least on a machine with intel graphics setting opening the intel kernel
driver and setting up the bufmgr (which is what fails above) should never fail.
If this is not a duplicate of bug #68166 (where nouveau isn't available and the
test falls over) then I think we need a new bug report for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20130818/6bf494a2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list