[Bug 71631] [Bisected]igt/pc8 fails

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Nov 21 09:04:30 PST 2013


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71631

--- Comment #7 from Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Imo the real bug here is that QA's kernel build doesn't have runtime pm
> > enabled. If we just skip paulo's nice runtime pm tests that's not good.
> 
> Yeah, that's my guess too. Even my SNB machine has that file, so I got
> surprised by QA's report.
> 
> Still, our test should work on cases where there's just PC8 support without
> runtime D3 (i.e., current drm-intel-nightly), so just forcing igt_assert on
> everything is not a good idea.

Our current options:

1 - Do *not* patch pm_pc8.c, so we'll still fail the test. This way we can make
sure QA's Kernels will always have runtime PM enabled. Maybe we could change
the commit message and say "please check if your Kernel has runtime PM
support". Then we'd close the bug once QA has correctly configured their
machines.

2 - Apply Chris's patch and SKIP the test in case the machine does not have
runtime PM support on the Kernel. This will benefit people who only have PC8
support and don't want to bother with runtime PM support.

I'd vote for option 1, especially since in the future PC8 and RPM will be a
single feature, so we'll always require the autosuspend_delay_ms file to exist.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20131121/64f33547/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list