[Bug 72102] [BDW]igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/forked-faulting-reloc-thrash-inactive causes assertion failure function

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72102

Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Same question as for persistent_relocs: Do the non-forked tests work
> correctly?
> 
> It sounds a bit like we have a rather stellar race somewhere in our reloc
> code ...
> 
> And one more: Does this test work well on older platforms?

Non-forked tests like igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/interruptible and
igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/normal failed either.

This test work well on older platforms, like： sandybridge, ivybridge, haswell

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20131129/55c0b82d/attachment.html>