[Bug 70948] New: [Regression] x11perf-1.5 performance reduced ~12% with gnome-session
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Oct 28 10:04:50 CET 2013
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70948
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70948
Assignee: chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Summary: [Regression] x11perf-1.5 performance reduced ~12% with
gnome-session
QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter: jianx.zhou at intel.com
Hardware: All
Status: NEW
Version: unspecified
Component: Driver/intel
Product: xorg
Created attachment 88212
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88212&action=edit
perf report log
System Environment:
----------------------------------------------
Platform:IVB/HSW
Libdrm: (master) 2.4.47
Mesa: (master) 7f7636830514ae37b9df9969c44637f55323d608
Xserver:(master) xorg-server-1.14.99.3-1-g7ecfab47eb221dbb996ea6c033
Xf86_video_intel:(master) 2.99.905-14-g64b9f57451501830f8031d1b6ac7289642da032d
Cairo: (master) 98fef3cef2d0f7f463a2e4f9f1b35b09f7b6ea77
Kernel: (drm-intel-nightly) 164a4cb4c1431a0689f85507868356fae24da638
gnome-shell:3.8.4-2
Bug detailed description:
---------------------------------------------
x11perf-1.5 performance reduced ~12% with gnome-session on IVB/HSW . The
problem doesn’t exist on Raw X.
It’s xserver regression. Compiling error when bisected this problem, so can’t
get first bad commit. The recent xserver good commit is git-7d3d4ae.
Please see “perf report log” attached.
Performance on IVB desktop
--------------------------------------------
xinit gnome-session
git-7d3d4ae 25100000 25600000
git-ccbe17b 25100000 22900000
Reproduce steps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1. xinit&
2. gnome-session
3. x11perf -aa10text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20131028/60c93fa3/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list