[Bug 78426] [BYT]Some subcases of igt/gem_exec_parse fails

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78426

--- Comment #3 from Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> ---
Created attachment 104602
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104602&action=edit
dmesg

(In reply to comment #2)
> This is known to be broken on -fixes. Please only reopen if there are
> failures with gem_exec_param on byt on -nightly.

Test failed on latest -nightly(da31e7c60be217316278a055dd3f91c33913270f) on
byt-m

root at x-bytm02:/GFX/Test/Intel_gpu_tools/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./gem_exec_parse
IGT-Version: 1.7-geda904c (x86_64) (Linux:
3.16.0_drm-intel-nightly_da31e7_20140814+ x86_64)
Subtest basic-allowed: SUCCESS
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest basic-rejected: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest registers: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest bitmasks: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest batch-without-end: FAIL
Subtest cmd-crossing-page: SUCCESS
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest oacontrol-tracking: FAIL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140814/2a8c9e33/attachment.html>