[Bug 78426] [IVB/HSW/BYT]Some subcases of igt/gem_exec_parse fails

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78426

Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[BYT]Some subcases of       |[IVB/HSW/BYT]Some subcases
                   |igt/gem_exec_parse fails    |of igt/gem_exec_parse fails

--- Comment #4 from Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> ---
This bug is able to reproduce on IVB and HSW platforms.

[root at x-ivb9 tests]# ./gem_exec_parse
IGT-Version: 1.7-g5c7bcb1 (x86_64) (Linux:
3.16.0_drm-intel-nightly_da31e7_20140814_debug+ x86_64)
Subtest basic-allowed: SUCCESS
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest basic-rejected: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest registers: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest bitmasks: FAIL
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest batch-without-end: FAIL
Subtest cmd-crossing-page: SUCCESS
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:135:
Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == expected_ret
error: 0 == -22
Subtest oacontrol-tracking: FAIL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140814/b06b4386/attachment.html>