[Bug 81638] [BYT]igt/gem_concurrent_blit some subcases unable to exit sporadically
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Jul 22 02:13:32 PDT 2014
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81638
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
Try with
commit 4f7d4dcae56e5f993f3f0b331556d4df3b0b33ab
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jul 21 07:54:29 2014 +0100
Use SIGTERM in replace of SIGQUIT
SIGTERM is the normal signal to use when instructing a process to exit.
The only difference is that an unhandled SIGQUIT is meant to generate a
coredump, which is not what we want, but in practice I encountered an
issue where SIGTERM seemed to be deliverable more reliably than SIGQUIT
(in tests using multiple signal helpers).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140722/0c945930/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list