[Bug 80578] [All Regression]igt/gem_fence_upload/thread-contention costs long time to execute sporadically
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Jul 22 02:32:03 PDT 2014
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80578
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit 37e9562453b813d2ea527bd9531fef2c3c592847
Author: Jason Low <jason.low2 at hp.com>
Date: Fri Jul 4 20:49:32 2014 -0700
locking/rwsem: Allow conservative optimistic spinning when readers have
lock
Commit 4fc828e24cd9 ("locking/rwsem: Support optimistic spinning")
introduced a major performance regression for workloads such as
xfs_repair which mix read and write locking of the mmap_sem across
many threads. The result was xfs_repair ran 5x slower on 3.16-rc2
than on 3.15 and using 20x more system CPU time.
Perf profiles indicate in some workloads that significant time can
be spent spinning on !owner. This is because we don't set the lock
owner when readers(s) obtain the rwsem.
In this patch, we'll modify rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() such that we'll
return false if there is no lock owner. The rationale is that if we
just entered the slowpath, yet there is no lock owner, then there is
a possibility that a reader has the lock. To be conservative, we'll
avoid spinning in these situations.
This patch reduced the total run time of the xfs_repair workload from
about 4 minutes 24 seconds down to approximately 1 minute 26 seconds,
back to close to the same performance as on 3.15.
Retesting of AIM7, which were some of the workloads used to test the
original optimistic spinning code, confirmed that we still get big
performance gains with optimistic spinning, even with this additional
regression fix. Davidlohr found that while the 'custom' workload took
a performance hit of ~-14% to throughput for >300 users with this
additional patch, the overall gain with optimistic spinning is
still ~+45%. The 'disk' workload even improved by ~+15% at >1000 users.
Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr at hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2 at hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1404532172.2572.30.camel@j-VirtualBox
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140722/6e4c951c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list