[Bug 70461] [sna suse] ddx assertion hits

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Jun 24 01:02:31 PDT 2014


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70461

--- Comment #58 from Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #57)
> (In reply to comment #56) 
> > Too optimistic:
> 
> That means an earlier operation added damage out-of-bounds. It will need a
> trace from --enable-debug=full to piece together the invalid operation. :(

With full debug I got:
  http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/Xorg.0.log.old.xz
and

#4  0x0000000000591638 in FatalError (f=0x7f3c67587960 "%s: damage box is
beyond the pixmap: box=(%d, %d), (%d, %d), pixmap=(%d, %d)\n") at log.c:908
#5  0x00007f3c67475f9d in _assert_pixmap_contains_box (pixmap=0x2769220,
box=0x7fffbb03ec70, function=0x7f3c67588568 <__FUNCTION__.23671>
"apply_damage") at sna_glyphs.c:100
#6  0x00007f3c67476dfd in apply_damage (op=0x7fffbb03ed20, r=0x7fffbb03ed00) at
sna_glyphs.c:504
#7  0x00007f3c67478593 in glyphs0_to_dst (sna=0x7f3c6d381000, op=3 '\003',
src=0x277fa70, dst=0x27383b0, src_x=0, src_y=0, nlist=0, list=0x7fffbb03f130,
glyphs=0x7fffbb03f538) at sna_glyphs.c:903
#8  0x00007f3c6747be5f in sna_glyphs (op=3 '\003', src=0x277fa70,
dst=0x27383b0, mask=0x180afe8, src_x=346, src_y=608, nlist=1,
list=0x7fffbb03f130, glyphs=0x7fffbb03f530) at sna_glyphs.c:1991
#9  0x0000000000512116 in damageGlyphs (op=<optimized out>, pSrc=0x277fa70,
pDst=0x27383b0, maskFormat=0x180afe8, xSrc=<optimized out>, ySrc=<optimized
out>, nlist=1, list=0x7fffbb03f130, glyphs=0x7fffbb03f530) at damage.c:629
#10 0x000000000050bcbe in ProcRenderCompositeGlyphs (client=0x1e4d690) at
render.c:1390
#11 0x000000000043cc3e in Dispatch () at dispatch.c:432
#12 0x000000000042c1ba in main (argc=11, argv=0x7fffbb03ff28, envp=<optimized
out>) at main.c:298

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140624/15cff55d/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list