[Bug 78426] New: [BYT]Some subcases of igt/gem_exec_parse fails
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu May 8 01:39:10 PDT 2014
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78426
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 78426
CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [BYT]Some subcases of igt/gem_exec_parse fails
QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: jinxianx.guo at intel.com
Hardware: Other
Status: NEW
Version: unspecified
Component: DRM/Intel
Product: DRI
Created attachment 98666
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=98666&action=edit
dmesg
*System Environment:
--------------------------
Regression: No.
The cases always fails
Non-working platforms: BYT
*kernel:
--------------------------
-nightly: dd28119c31cf06fc4c3bb548699018a91e45a676 (fails)
-queued: 1cf0ba14740d96fbf6f58a201f000a34b74f4725 (fails)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon May 5 09:07:33 2014 +0100
drm/i915: Flush request queue when waiting for ring space
During the review of
commit 1f70999f9052f5a1b0ce1a55aff3808f2ec9fe42
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jan 27 22:43:07 2014 +0000
drm/i915: Prevent recursion by retiring requests when the ring is full
Ville raised the point that our interaction with request->tail was
likely to foul up other uses elsewhere (such as hang check comparing
ACTHD against requests).
However, we also need to restore the implicit retire requests that certain
test cases depend upon (e.g. igt/gem_exec_lut_handle), this raises the
spectre that the ppgtt will randomly call i915_gpu_idle() and recurse
back into intel_ring_begin().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78023
Reviewed-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
[danvet: Remove now unused 'tail' variable as spotted by Brad.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
-fixes: e4c610fe051579ba0a1fadf339905b0231c6ef94 (skips)
Author: Egbert Eich <eich at suse.de>
Date: Fri Apr 11 19:07:44 2014 +0200
drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order
When linking the i2c sysfs file into the connector's directory
pass directory and link target in the right order.
This code was introduced with:
commit 931c1c26983b4f84e33b78579fc8d57e4a14c6b4
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Date: Tue Feb 11 17:12:51 2014 +0200
drm/i915: sdvo: add i2c sysfs symlink to the connector's directory
This is the same what we do for DP connectors, so make things more
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <eich at suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
*Bug detailed description:
-----------------------------
Some subcases of igt/gem_exec_parse below fails
igt/gem_exec_parse/basic-rejected
igt/gem_exec_parse/batch-without-end
igt/gem_exec_parse/bitmasks
igt/gem_exec_parse/oacontrol-tracking
igt/gem_exec_parse/registers
Output:
./gem_exec_parse --run-subtest registers
IGT-Version: 1.6-g7935bbd (x86_64) (Linux:
3.15.0-rc3_drm-intel-next-queued_1cf0ba_20140508+ x86_64)
Test assertion failure function exec_batch, file gem_exec_parse.c:134:
Last errno: 0, Success
Failed assertion: expected_ret == 0
Subtest registers: FAIL
The result on -fixes was skipped:
./gem_exec_parse --run-subtest registers
IGT-Version: 1.6-g7935bbd (x86_64) (Linux:
3.15.0-rc3_drm-intel-fixes_e4c610_20140508+ x86_64)
Test requirement not met in function __real_main210, file gem_exec_parse.c:222:
Last errno: 22, Invalid argument
Test requirement: (!(!rc && parser_version > 0))
Subtest registers: SKIP
*Reproduce steps:
----------------------------
1. ./gem_exec_parse --run-subtest registers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140508/692fa413/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list