[Bug 86425] New: [BYT]igt/gem_exec_big fails

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86425

            Bug ID: 86425
           Summary: [BYT]igt/gem_exec_big fails
           Product: DRI
           Version: XOrg git
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/Intel
          Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: jinxianx.guo at intel.com
        QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org

Created attachment 109658
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=109658&action=edit
dmesg

==System Environment==
--------------------------
Regression: Not sure,
I didn't find good commit on -fixes branch

Non-working platforms: BDW

==kernel==
--------------------------
origin/drm-intel-nightly: 2728bc8199164de1a27586f8c94e37d03120f8cd(works)
    drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-11m-17d-20h-21m-51s UTC integration manifest
origin/drm-intel-next-queued: 6ac0483b35bfc7546398d1198b65ed7be17f3cc5(works)
    drm/i915: Propagate invalid setcrtc cloning errors back to userspace
origin/drm-intel-fixes: 0485c9dc24ec0939b42ca5104c0373297506b555(fails)
    drm/i915: Kick fbdev before vgacon

==Bug detailed description==
igt/gem_exec_big fails

Output:
[root at x-byt05 tests]# ./gem_exec_big
IGT-Version: 1.8-gaa63fc7 (x86_64) (Linux:
3.18.0-rc5_drm-intel-fixes_0485c9_20141118+ x86_64)
Test assertion failure function exec, file gem_exec_big.c:97:
Failed assertion: tmp == gem_reloc[0].presumed_offset
error: 0 != 274432
[root at x-byt05 tests]# echo $?
99


==Reproduce steps==
---------------------------- 
1. ./gem_exec_big

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20141118/6e90a9e5/attachment.html>