[Bug 77074] Xorg crashes while using Aegisub

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Sep 10 06:30:30 PDT 2014


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77074

--- Comment #91 from Tyler Foo <tftylerfoo at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #90)
> No. It is the right build, so it should be dumping the FatalError on asserts
> now. What's odd in the log file is:
> 
> Sep 10 21:03:58 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:1[1187]: sna_wakeup_handler
> Sep 10 21:03:58 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:1[1187]: sna_accel_do_throttle -- no
> pending activity
> Sep 10 21:03:58 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:1[1187]: has_shadow: has pending
> damage? 0, outstanding flips: 0
> Sep 10 21:03:58 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:1[1187]: sna_block_handler
> (tv=597.543000)
> Sep 10 21:03:58 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:1[1187]: sna_wakeup_handler
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_accel_do_throttle
> (time=528700), triggered
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_scanout_do_flush: flush
> timer active: delta=15
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_block_handler (tv=-1.0)
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_accel_flush: flush?=0,
> dirty?=0
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_accel_flush: flush?=0,
> dirty?=0
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_accel_wakeup_handler:
> nbatch=0, need_retire=0, need_purge=0
> Sep 10 21:03:29 archins3437 gdm-Xorg-:0[541]: sna_wakeup_handler
> 
> There is a 30 second period where one X disappears and new one starts up
> without that transition being logged at all. (The log begins with usual
> startup for Xorg-:0[541], but nothing at all is visible for Xorg-:1[1187])
> 
> ARGH.

Maybe I don't use GDM to start my X and just use startx to start a rootless X
and when the crash happens, the assert should be displayed on the VT? Will this
do?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20140910/b321fb06/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list