[Bug 92602] [HSW BDW SKL BSW] [IGT Basic] kms_pipe_crc_basic is epic fail
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Dec 8 01:34:40 PST 2015
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92602
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #20 from Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> ---
(In reply to Daniel Vetter from comment #19)
> Ok, we need to split this bug up, there's way too many different bugs here.
> From the bug filing BKMs:
>
> - if the WARNING in dmesg is different, it's a different bug. Special case:
> for pipe_config mismatch you need to look at the *ERROR* right above. We
> seem to have mismatches here in has_infoframes (tracked in bug #93119),
> dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1, base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock and port_clock. The
> three clock mismatches are probably related.
>
> - igt failure below seems to be another issue again. Probably needs a
> separate bug.
>
> rtcwake: assuming RTC uses UTC ...
> rtcwake: wakeup from "mem" using /dev/rtc0 at Thu Nov 26 10:40:57 2015
> rtcwake: assuming RTC uses UTC ...
> rtcwake: wakeup from "mem" using /dev/rtc0 at Thu Nov 26 10:40:57 2015
> suspend-read-crc-pipe-B: Testing connector eDP-1 using pipe B
> suspend-read-crc-pipe-B: Testing connector HDMI-A-1 using pipe B
> Test assertion failure function igt_primary_plane_commit_legacy, file
> igt_kms.c:1532:
> Failed assertion: ret == 0
> Last errno: 22, Invalid argument
> Stack trace:
> #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0xf1]
> #1 [do_display_commit+0xae8]
> #2 [igt_display_commit2+0xe]
> #3 [test_read_crc.constprop.1+0x175]
> #4 [__real_main214+0x2c7]
> #5 [main+0x29]
> #6 [__libc_start_main+0xf5]
> #7 [_start+0x29]
> #8 [<unknown>+0x29]
> Subtest suspend-read-crc-pipe-B failed.
> **** DEBUG ****
>
> - once we have split out all the bugs per BKM please add an entry here
> linking to all the new ones and close this one as invalid/superseeded. All
> the new bugs should be priority=highest since they're BAT failures.
>
> Thanks, Daniel
I dont see any further comments here linking to newly created bugs, so closing
this one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20151208/fe638202/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list