[Bug 92795] New: [BXT] igt / gem_pread_after_blit several subcases are fail
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Nov 3 05:47:52 PST 2015
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92795
Bug ID: 92795
Summary: [BXT] igt / gem_pread_after_blit several subcases are
fail
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: DRM/Intel
Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: christophe.prigent at intel.com
QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Created attachment 119378
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=119378&action=edit
kern.log
BXT-P
Hardware
Platform: Broxton P A0 Platform
CPU Name : Intel(R) @ 1.2 GHz (family: 6, model: 92, stepping: 8) – 4 cores
SoC : BROXTON-P A0
CRB : Apollo Lake RVP Fab1
Software
Linux distribution: Ubuntu 15.04 64 bits
kernel 4.3.0-rc5 (26f82bd8) from https://github.com/ideak/linux.git BXT branch
commit 26f82bd872901733b739480e8899a92966ae9292
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:44:03 2015 +0300
drm/i915/bxt: update bxt_defconfig
Enable Kconfig options needed for UART/eMMC.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
BIOS: APLKRVPA.X64.0104.R43.1510080446
BIOS (IFWI Version): APLK_IFWI_X64_R_2015_41_5_02
CSE : 3.0.0.1044
KSC : 1.02
One HDMI monitor connected: Samsung ls24c65u
Regression:
------------
No. Tested for the first time
Steps:
-------
1. Execute command:
./gem_pread_after_blit
Actual result:
--------------
1. Following subcases are fail:
uncached-hang
snooped-interruptible
snooped-hang
display-normal
display-interruptible
display-hang
Expected result:
----------------
1. Subcases are Pass
/var/log/kern.log attached
Log from IGT:
--------------
./gem_pread_after_blit
IGT-Version: 1.12-NOT-GIT (x86_64) (Linux: 4.3.0-rc5-intel-bxt+ x86_64)
Subtest default-normal: SUCCESS (0.056s)
Subtest default-interruptible: SUCCESS (4.816s)
Subtest default-hang: SUCCESS (51.180s)
Subtest uncached-normal: SUCCESS (0.048s)
Subtest uncached-interruptible: SUCCESS (4.816s)
Test assertion failure function intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring, file
intel_batchbuffer.c:184:
Failed assertion: (drm_intel_gem_bo_context_exec(batch->bo, ctx, used, ring))
== 0
Last errno: 5, Input/output error
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring+0xbf]
#2 [intel_batchbuffer_flush+0x91a]
#3 [intel_blt_copy+0x94f]
#4 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#5 [do_test+0x102]
#6 [__real_main197+0x313]
#7 [main+0x35]
#8 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#9 [_start+0x29]
#10 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest uncached-hang failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: has_ban_period
Test requirement passed: has_gpu_reset(fd)
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring, file
intel_batchbuffer.c:184:
Failed assertion: (drm_intel_gem_bo_context_exec(batch->bo, ctx, used, ring))
== 0
Last errno: 5, Input/output error
**** END ****
Subtest uncached-hang: FAIL (17.152s)
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Subtest snooped-normal: CRASH (0.000s)
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_blt_copy+0x355]
#2 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#3 [do_test+0x62]
#4 [__real_main197+0x25b]
#5 [main+0x35]
#6 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#7 [_start+0x29]
#8 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest snooped-interruptible failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
**** END ****
Subtest snooped-interruptible: FAIL (0.004s)
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_blt_copy+0x355]
#2 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#3 [do_test+0x62]
#4 [__real_main197+0x313]
#5 [main+0x35]
#6 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#7 [_start+0x29]
#8 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest snooped-hang failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: has_ban_period
Test requirement passed: has_gpu_reset(fd)
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
**** END ****
Subtest snooped-hang: FAIL (0.004s)
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_blt_copy+0x355]
#2 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#3 [do_test+0x62]
#4 [__real_main197+0x1b3]
#5 [main+0x35]
#6 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#7 [_start+0x29]
#8 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest display-normal failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
**** END ****
Subtest display-normal: FAIL (0.004s)
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_blt_copy+0x355]
#2 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#3 [do_test+0x62]
#4 [__real_main197+0x25b]
#5 [main+0x35]
#6 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#7 [_start+0x29]
#8 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest display-interruptible failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
**** END ****
Subtest display-interruptible: FAIL (0.004s)
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [intel_blt_copy+0x355]
#2 [intel_copy_bo+0x95]
#3 [do_test+0x62]
#4 [__real_main197+0x313]
#5 [main+0x35]
#6 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#7 [_start+0x29]
#8 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest display-hang failed.
**** DEBUG ****
Test requirement passed: has_ban_period
Test requirement passed: has_gpu_reset(fd)
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test requirement passed: ret == 0
Test assertion failure function intel_blt_copy, file intel_batchbuffer.c:384:
Failed assertion: batch->end == NULL
**** END ****
Subtest display-hang: FAIL (0.004s)
Test assertion failure function gem_quiescent_gpu, file drmtest.c:180:
Failed assertion: drmIoctl((fd), ((((1U) << (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) <<
(0+8)) | (((0x40 + 0x29)) << 0) | ((((sizeof(struct
drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2)))) << ((0+8)+8)))), (&execbuf)) == 0
Last errno: 5, Input/output error
error: -1 != 0
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x11d]
#1 [gem_quiescent_gpu+0x147]
#2 [quiescent_gpu_at_exit+0x1d]
#3 [call_exit_handlers+0x26]
#4 [igt_atexit_handler+0x23]
#5 [__libc_secure_getenv+0x112]
#6 [exit+0x15]
#7 [igt_exit+0x185]
#8 [main+0x3a]
#9 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#10 [_start+0x29]
#11 [<unknown>+0x29]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20151103/a0192ba8/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list