[Bug 97381] New: kmem_cache_destroy - possible recursive locking detected
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Aug 17 11:39:54 UTC 2016
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97381
Bug ID: 97381
Summary: kmem_cache_destroy - possible recursive locking
detected
Product: DRI
Version: DRI git
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: DRM/Intel
Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: matthew.auld at intel.com
QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Created attachment 125843
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=125843&action=edit
dmesg
[ 706.898063] =============================================
[ 706.898078] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 706.898094] 4.8.0-rc2-drm-intel-debug+ #21 Tainted: G U W
[ 706.898108] ---------------------------------------------
[ 706.898123] rmmod/1889 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 706.898137] (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8151e7bb>]
get_partial_node+0x5b/0x460
[ 706.898172]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 706.898196] (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81525f1c>]
__kmem_cache_shutdown+0xac/0x670
[ 706.898227]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 706.898252] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 706.898276] CPU0
[ 706.898288] ----
[ 706.898300] lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 706.898315] lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 706.898330]
*** DEADLOCK ***
See attachment for the rest.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20160817/1bdfb681/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list