[Bug 94294] [BAT ILK SNB BSW HSW] basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank timestamp vs. seq counter difference

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294

--- Comment #8 from Jairo Miramontes <jairo.daniel.miramontes.caton at intel.com> ---
Tested this on a BSW platform and Passed.

The output is the following:


./kms_flip --run-subtest basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank
IGT-Version: 1.14-g5cc3175 (x86_64) (Linux:
4.6.0-drm-intel-nightly-ww22-commit-3a7ef25+ x86_64)
Using monotonic timestamps
Beginning basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank on pipe A, connector eDP-1
  1366x768 60 1366 1414 1446 1610 768 771 776 790 0x9 0x48 76320
...............................
basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank on pipe A, connector eDP-1: PASSED

Beginning basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank on pipe B, connector eDP-1
  1366x768 60 1366 1414 1446 1610 768 771 776 790 0x9 0x48 76320
...............................
basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank on pipe B, connector eDP-1: PASSED



Using the following Kernel
-------------------Kernel-------------------------------------------------
commit 3a7ef25d3113e570e14d8f78606047f86f1bc4a4
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Date:   Tue May 24 15:44:17 2016 +0300

    drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-24d-12h-43m-51s UTC integration manifest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This kernel already includes the patches proposed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20160525/69deee20/attachment.html>