https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94588
yann <yann.argotti at intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[IVB/KBL/BSW/BXT/BDW] |[IVB/KBL/BSW/BXT/BDW]
|[Regression] |igt/gem_reloc_overflow
|igt/gem_reloc_overflow |regression for
|regression for |single-overflow
|single-overflow |
Severity|critical |normal
Priority|highest |medium
--- Comment #26 from yann <yann.argotti at intel.com> ---
(In reply to Kimmo Nikkanen from comment #25)
> As Matt mentioned this case is expected to fail. This due to the
> shortcomings in the kernel implementation.
>
> Why we are now seeing this as an "regression" is due to Chris' changes to
> the IGT case. These changes are making the actual problem to be more
> visible. Yet, nothing has changed on the Kernel side so in that sense we
> haven't regressed.
Agreed, this is clearly not a regression and therefore updating title and
priority/severity accordingly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20161005/612d346e/attachment.html>