[Bug 96606] [APL] [BAT] gem_exec_nop / basic sporadically fail

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Sep 23 21:07:13 UTC 2016


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96606

--- Comment #24 from Carlos Santa <carlos.santa at intel.com> ---

I've applied the GuC/HuC loading patch series:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/11926/
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/11158/

on top of this kernel commit

commit 4ca90e7c3b6e429e033b93fc56fc156da8f222ef
Author: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at linaro.org>
Date:   Tue Sep 20 18:13:58 2016 +0530

    drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-09m-20d-12h-43m-32s UTC integration manifest


The latest changes to gem_exec_nop.c relaxes the assertion for parallel
execution, and with that the test is now passing:

IGT-Version: 1.16-g237cb89 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.8.0-rc7guc-huc-patch-series+
x86_64)
Using GuC submission
Maximum execution latency on render, 6.693us, min 2.876us, total 15.365us per
cycle, average 3.841us
All (4 engines): 565,248 cycles, average 17.778us per cycle [expected 3.830us]
Subtest basic-series: SUCCESS (14.075s)
average (individually): 3.829us
blt: 105472 cycles, 94.925us
vebox: 103424 cycles, 96.829us
bsd: 104448 cycles, 95.939us
render: 219136 cycles, 45.767us
Subtest basic-parallel: SUCCESS (14.048s)
default: 2,926,592 cycles: 6.834us
Subtest default: SUCCESS (20.003s)
render: 3,050,496 cycles: 6.560us
Subtest render: SUCCESS (20.015s)
bsd: 6,914,048 cycles: 2.893us
Subtest bsd: SUCCESS (20.003s)
Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file
ioctl_wrappers.c:1450:
Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring)
Subtest bsd1: SKIP (0.000s)
Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file
ioctl_wrappers.c:1450:
Test requirement: gem_has_ring(fd, ring)
Subtest bsd2: SKIP (0.000s)
blt: 6,952,960 cycles: 2.877us
Subtest blt: SUCCESS (20.003s)
vebox: 6,894,592 cycles: 2.901us
Subtest vebox: SUCCESS (20.004s)
Maximum execution latency on render, 6.433us, min 2.880us, total 15.111us per
cycle, average 3.778us
All (4 engines): 9,031,680 cycles, average 16.610us per cycle [expected
3.768us]
Subtest series: SUCCESS (154.046s)
average (individually): 3.845us
render: 3315712 cycles, 45.241us
blt: 1601536 cycles, 93.665us
vebox: 1582080 cycles, 94.819us
bsd: 1572864 cycles, 95.376us
Subtest parallel: SUCCESS (154.031s)

------------------------------------------

 Software information 
============================================ 
Kernel version                  : 4.8.0-rc7guc-huc-patch-series+ 
Linux distribution              : Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS 
Architecture                    : 64-bit 
Kernel driver in use            : i915 
Bios revision                   : 144.10 
Bios release date               : 06/27/2016 
KSC revision                    : 1.15 

 Hardware information 
============================================ 
Platform                        : BXT-P 
Motherboard model               : Broxton P 
Motherboard type                : NOTEBOOK Hand Held 
Motherboard manufacturer        : Intel Corp. 
CPU family                      : Other 
CPU information                 : 06/5c 
GPU Card                        : Intel Corporation Device 5a84 (rev 0a)
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) 
Memory ram                      : 16 GB 
Maximum memory ram allowed      : 16 GB 
Display resolution              :  
CPU thread                      : 4 
CPU core                        : 4 
Socket                          : Other 
Signature                       :  
Hard drive capacity             : 74GiB (80GB) 

 Firmwares information 
============================================ 
DMC fw loaded                   : yes 
DMC version                     : 1.7 
GUC fw loaded                   : SUCCESS 
GUC version wanted              : 8.7 
GUC version found               : 8.7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20160923/7ccc129a/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list