[Bug 104013] [CI] igt at perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-[vcs0|bcs0] - Failed assertion: (double)(val[1] - val[0]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(slept) && (double)(val[1] - val[0]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(slept)

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104013

Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[CI]                        |[CI]
                   |igt at perf_pmu@semaphore-wait |igt at perf_pmu@semaphore-wait
                   |-vcs0 - Failed assertion:   |-[vcs0|bcs0] - Failed
                   |(double)(val[1] - val[0])   |assertion: (double)(val[1]
                   |<= (1.0 + (tolerance)) *    |- val[0]) <= (1.0 +
                   |(double)(slept) &&          |(tolerance)) *
                   |(double)(val[1] - val[0])   |(double)(slept) &&
                   |>= (1.0 - (tolerance)) *    |(double)(val[1] - val[0])
                   |(double)(slept)             |>= (1.0 - (tolerance)) *
                   |                            |(double)(slept)

--- Comment #1 from Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com> ---
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3438/shard-apl1/igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-bcs0.html


(perf_pmu:2639) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function sema_wait, file
perf_pmu.c:433:
(perf_pmu:2639) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(val[1] - val[0]) <= (1.0 +
(tolerance)) * (double)(slept) && (double)(val[1] - val[0]) >= (1.0 -
(tolerance)) * (double)(slept)
(perf_pmu:2639) CRITICAL: 'val[1] - val[0]' != 'slept' (450000000.000000 not
within 5.000000% tolerance of 500083573.000000)
Subtest semaphore-wait-bcs0 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20171204/2d95f2b4/attachment-0001.html>