[Bug 104318] New: [CI] igt at pm_rps@min-max-config-idle - Failed assertion: igt_ioctl((fd), ((((2U|1U) << (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) << (0+8)) | (((0x40 + 0x17)) << 0) | ((((sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_busy)))) << ((0+8)+8)))), (&busy)) == 0

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Dec 18 11:40:22 UTC 2017


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104318

            Bug ID: 104318
           Summary: [CI] igt at pm_rps@min-max-config-idle - Failed
                    assertion: igt_ioctl((fd), ((((2U|1U) <<
                    (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) << (0+8)) | (((0x40 +
                    0x17)) << 0) | ((((sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_busy))))
                    << ((0+8)+8)))), (&busy)) == 0
           Product: DRI
           Version: DRI git
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/Intel
          Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: marta.lofstedt at intel.com
        QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3538/shard-apl6/igt@pm_rps@min-max-config-idle.html

(pm_rps:1816) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
gem_bo_busy, file ioctl_wrappers.c:941:
(pm_rps:1816) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: igt_ioctl((fd),
((((2U|1U) << (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) << (0+8)) | (((0x40 + 0x17)) << 0) |
((((sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_busy)))) << ((0+8)+8)))), (&busy)) == 0
(pm_rps:1816) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such file or directory
(pm_rps:1816) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -1 != 0
Subtest min-max-config-idle failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20171218/f3ea3a7b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list