[Bug 104318] [CI] igt at pm_rps@min-max-config-idle - Failed assertion: igt_ioctl((fd), ((((2U|1U) << (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) << (0+8)) | (((0x40 + 0x17)) << 0) | ((((sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_busy)))) << ((0+8)+8)))), (&busy)) == 0

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104318

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
Quite bizarre;

commit d3bcc7d0a51a898b4fb1625d529907319d235ee7 (upstream/master,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Dec 11 12:35:35 2017 +0000

    igt/pm_rps: Always allocate spin[0]

    Avoid having to test for spin[0] existing by starting the load-loop with
    it allocated.

    v2: Preallocate the spin[1] as well for high load.

    References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104060
    Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104318
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg at intel.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20171220/c184d18a/attachment.html>