[Bug 99471] [SKL][KBL] Test assertion failure function igt_display_commit_atomic/two_screens_cursor_vs_flip for i915.nuclear_pageflip=1

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Feb 2 07:21:46 UTC 2017


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99471

Maarten Lankhorst <bugs at mblankhorst.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Maarten Lankhorst <bugs at mblankhorst.nl> ---
Same story as 99472:

commit 5b8a1ba36e9a99fd2674e9bfa1bb7f6f039c2c7c
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Jan 18 10:41:37 2017 +0100

    kms_cursor_legacy: Use cursor movement instead of hiding for 2x tests

    This forces the cursor fastpath to be used. While at it, add -atomic
    versions of the test to compare legacy pageflip vs atomic.

    The nonblocking modeset test is changed slightly, due to cdclk changes
    the page flip may be stalled so it's not useful to test it. Just test
    that a queued page flip + nonblocking modeset works as intended and
    there is no kernel spew.

    Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>

commit 396601872ae2e8a8ee9c98569b04ea2078f0adb5
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 17:07:52 2017 +0100

    kms_cursor_legacy: Make the 2x tests slightly more useful.

    Trying to run as many cursor updates during a nonblocking modeset won't
    work, because both crtc's might be involved in the modeset. Instead
    try to run as many cursor updates on both crtc's at the same time,
    while trying to queue page flips in between.

    Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20170202/0bf2a10f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list