[Bug 103857] [CI] igt at perf_pmu@* - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(val[i]) <= (1.0 + tolerance) * (double)0.0f && (double)(val[i]) >= (1.0 - tolerance) * (double)0.0f
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Nov 24 09:26:44 UTC 2017
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103857
Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #18 from Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com> ---
There are only two remaining issues with the perf_mmu tests after the patch was
integrated are:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3377/shard-glkb6/igt@perf_pmu@multi-client-vecs0.html
(perf_pmu:4132) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function multi_client, file
perf_pmu.c:650:
(perf_pmu:4132) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(val[1]) <= (1.0 +
(tolerance)) * (double)(slept) && (double)(val[1]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) *
(double)(slept)
(perf_pmu:4132) CRITICAL: 'val[1]' != 'slept' (190889525.000000 not within
5.000000% tolerance of 166780280.000000)
Subtest multi-client-vecs0 failed.
and:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3378/shard-snb1/igt@perf_pmu@rc6p.html
(perf_pmu:4323) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_rc6p, file
perf_pmu.c:1051:
(perf_pmu:4323) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(idle[i] - prev[i]) <= (1.0
+ (tolerance)) * (double)(slept) && (double)(idle[i] - prev[i]) >= (1.0 -
(tolerance)) * (double)(slept)
(perf_pmu:4323) CRITICAL: 'idle[i] - prev[i]' != 'slept' (0.000000 not within
5.000000% tolerance of 2000125801.000000)
Subtest rc6p failed.
the GLK issue is now handled in bug 103886
the SNB issue is now handled in bug 103885
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20171124/34447cdf/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list