[Bug 102691] New: [CI][HSW, SNB] igt at kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180-flip - Fail

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Sep 13 06:08:49 UTC 2017


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102691

            Bug ID: 102691
           Summary: [CI][HSW, SNB]
                    igt at kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180-flip - Fail
           Product: DRI
           Version: DRI git
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/Intel
          Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: marta.lofstedt at intel.com
        QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org

>From CI_DRM_3078 igt at kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180-flip fail on HSW and
SNB shards.
This appear to be a new test that has failed so far on all 3 runs.

(kms_rotation_crc:1507) igt-debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
igt_assert_crc_equal, file igt_debugfs.c:345:
(kms_rotation_crc:1507) igt-debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !mismatch
Subtest sprite-rotation-180-flip failed.

Full data:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3078/shard-snb4/igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180-flip.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3078/shard-hsw3/igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180-flip.html

This issue started with:
commit af4158671c030c9e7f3fbe9e7e2032d145f86d4d
Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 11 18:14:57 2017 +0100

    kms_rotation_crc: 90 degree flip test is not a stress test

I don't know if it is the intention of this test to exploit an issue or if it
is a plain regression.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20170913/fa8ab8fb/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list