[Bug 102199] Kabylake has poor performance, doesn't upclock during activity quickly with single display configurations

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Jan 18 17:20:56 UTC 2018


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102199

--- Comment #30 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
Note, the rps boost was slightly reduced in ferocity in 

commit e9af4ea2b9e7e5d3caa6354be14de06b678ed0fa
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Jan 18 13:16:09 2018 +0000

    drm/i915: Avoid waitboosting on the active request

    Watching a light workload on Baytrail (running glxgears and a 1080p
    decode), instead of the system remaining at low frequency, the glxgears
    would regularly trigger waitboosting after which it would have to spend
    a few seconds throttling back down. In this case, the waitboosting is
    counter productive as the minimal wait for glxgears doesn't prevent it
    from functioning correctly and delivering frames on time. In this case,
    glxgears happens to almost always be waiting on the current request,
    which we already expect to complete quickly (see i915_spin_request) and
    so avoiding the waitboost on the active request and spinning instead
    provides the best latency without overcommitting to upclocking.
    However, if the system falls behind we still force the waitboost.
    Similarly, we will also trigger upclocking if we detect the system is
    not delivering frames on time - again using a mechanism that tries to
    detect a miss and not preemptively upclock.

    v2: Also skip boosting for after missed vblank if the desired request is
    already active.

    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
    Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
    Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg at intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
    Link:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180118131609.16574-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180118/3b5e9a37/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list