[Bug 106848] New: [Not CI][GM45] igt at gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx - fail - Failed assertion: memcmp(ptr , tiled_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0 (edit)
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Jun 7 11:59:18 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106848
Bug ID: 106848
Summary: [Not CI][GM45] igt at gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx
- fail - Failed assertion: memcmp(ptr , tiled_pattern,
PAGE_SIZE) == 0 (edit)
Product: DRI
Version: DRI git
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: medium
Component: DRM/Intel
Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: promarbler14 at gmail.com
QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Copying from the comment made on bug #102575 to here.
> Pardon my intrusion.
>
> Running subtest basic-small-bo-tiledX with latest igt-gpu-tools
> (1.22+173+gf560ae5a-1) and drm-tip (4.17rc6+1560+g9d5095539d5f+755171-1)
> yields high failure rates on my GM45: out of 1000 iterations, only 360 are
> successful.
>
> Neither basic-small-bo-tiledY nor basic-small-bo have any failures with 100
> iterations each.
>
> Platform:
> Dell Inspiron 1545
> Eagle Lake / Core2Duo (Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4200 @ 2.00GHz) / GMA4500
> LVDS (VGA)
>
> I tested it out of curiosity to its relation to my other bug. [#103025]
In my own investigation I have found the failure to start between kernels 4.7
and 4.8, making it easy to bisect. I haven't finished the bisect yet, but I
believe there is some relation to the mm's compaction and oom changes that were
made around that time; as I recall, it took quite a bit of time to get those mm
changes working right.
I can have the bisect results within a day.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180607/e18b6de1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list