[Bug 106344] [CI] igt at sw_sync@sync_multi_consumer_producer - fail - Failed assertion: counter == MULTI_CONSUMER_PRODUCER_THREADS * MULTI_CONSUMER_PRODUCER_ITERATIONS

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Jun 15 11:07:47 UTC 2018


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106344

--- Comment #3 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
Applied

commit 91f5d4665b07f073c78abd3cd4b8e0e347dbf638 (upstream/master)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed May 2 10:24:26 2018 +0100

    igt/sw_sync: Wrap threaded counter manipulation with mb

    sw_sync/sync_multi_consumer_producer was communicating between threads
    using the sw_sync ioctl and manipulating a shared volatile counter.
    However, the ioctl itself does not imply a memory barrier, and so
    different CPUs may see different states of the counter (the volatile
    making GCC perform the operation in stages making the race even more
    likely). Instead of using volatile, use locked operations to make the
    counter manipulation thread-safe.

    References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>

for good measure.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180615/dd35bc2f/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list