[Bug 105157] [CI] igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-* - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(busy_r) <= (1.0 + (0.15)) * (double)((double)target_busy_pct / 100.0) && (double)(busy_r) >= (1.0 - (0.15)) * (double)((double)target_busy_pct / 100.0)

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105157

--- Comment #13 from Octavio <octaviox.hernandez.lopez at intel.com> ---
This test fails on CFL QA 

igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2-bcs0

IGT-Version: 1.22-g5d71d77 (x86_64) (Linux:
4.16.0-rc4-drm-intel-qa-ww11-commit-73f9dfa+ x86_64)
calibration=1000000us, test=1000000us; ratio=2.00% (2500us/122500us)
0: busy 21295us, idle 1043658us: 2.00% (target: 2%)
1: busy 40179us, idle 1968831us: 2.00% (target: 2%)
error=-25.32% (1.49% vs 2.00%)
Stack trace:
  #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
  #1 [accuracy+0x779]
  #2 [__real_main1597+0x2009]
  #3 [main+0x23]
  #4 [__libc_start_main+0xf1]
  #5 [_start+0x29]
  #6 [<unknown>+0x29]
Subtest busy-accuracy-2-bcs0: FAIL (3.083s)
Test requirement not met in function gem_require_engine, file
./../lib/igt_gt.h:120:
Test requirement: gem_has_engine(gem_fd, class, instance)
Test requirement not met in function gem_require_engine, file
./../lib/igt_gt.h:120:
Test requirement: gem_has_engine(gem_fd, class, instance)

(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file
perf_pmu.c:1593:
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(busy_r) <= (1.0 + (0.15))
* (double)(expected) && (double)(busy_r) >= (1.0 - (0.15)) * (double)(expected)
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Last errno: 9, Bad file descriptor
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: 'busy_r' != 'expected' (0.014935 not within
+15.000000%/-15.000000% tolerance of 0.020000)
Subtest busy-accuracy-2-bcs0 failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(perf_pmu:1536) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: gem_has_execlists(gem_fd)
(perf_pmu:1536) INFO: calibration=1000000us, test=1000000us; ratio=2.00%
(2500us/122500us)
(perf_pmu:1536) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: !(fd < 0 && errno == ENODEV)
(perf_pmu:1536) INFO: error=-25.32% (1.49% vs 2.00%)
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file
perf_pmu.c:1593:
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(busy_r) <= (1.0 + (0.15))
* (double)(expected) && (double)(busy_r) >= (1.0 - (0.15)) * (double)(expected)
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: Last errno: 9, Bad file descriptor
(perf_pmu:1536) CRITICAL: 'busy_r' != 'expected' (0.014935 not within
+15.000000%/-15.000000% tolerance of 0.020000)
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO: Stack trace:
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #1 [accuracy+0x779]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #2 [__real_main1597+0x2009]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #3 [main+0x23]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #4 [__libc_start_main+0xf1]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #5 [_start+0x29]
(perf_pmu:1536) igt-core-INFO:   #6 [<unknown>+0x29]
****  END  ****

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180313/8f6a8983/attachment.html>