[Bug 95424] [IGT] igt at gem_shrink@hang-oom and execbufn* are crash (no GPU hang)
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Mar 21 18:28:46 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #52 from Octavio <octaviox.hernandez.lopez at intel.com> ---
The below test cases fail on CFL QA
igt at gem_shrink@execbuf1-oom
igt at gem_shrink@execbufX-oom
igt at gem_shrink@hang-oom
igt at gem_shrink@mmap-cpu-oom
igt at gem_shrink@pread-userptr
igt at gem_shrink@pwrite-oom
IGT-Version: 1.22-g94e8862 (x86_64) (Linux:
4.16.0-rc6-drm-intel-qa-ww12-commit-9d737ce+ x86_64)
Using 125 processes and 128MiB per process
Subtest execbuf1-oom: CRASH (27.589s)
Subtest execbuf1-oom: CRASH (27.589s)
Subtest execbuf1-oom: CRASH (27.589s)
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
#0 [fatal_sig_handler+0xfb]
#1 [killpg+0x40]
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
#0 [fatal_sig_handler+0xfb]
#1 [killpg+0x40]
#2 [__real_main369+0x694]
#2 [__real_main369+0x694]
#3 [main+0x23]
#3 [main+0x23]
#4 [__libc_start_m a#i4n +[0_x_lfi1b]c_
start_main+0xf1]
#5 [#_s5t a[r_ts+t0axr2t9+]0
x29]
# 6# 6[ <[u<nuknnkonwonw>n+>0+x02x92]9
]
Received signal SIGSEGV.
Stack trace:
#0 [fatal_sig_handler+0xfb]
#1 [killpg+0x40]
#2 [__real_main369+0x694]
#3 [main+0x23]
#4 [__libc_start_main+0xf1]
#5 [_start+0x29]
#6 [<unknown>+0x29]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180321/3ac8da94/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list