[Bug 105249] [CI] igt at gem_ctx_isolation@* - incomplete
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Mar 23 17:06:57 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105249
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #15 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit 46b3617dfec875c1414c6ccbfcab371c97735562
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Mar 23 10:18:24 2018 +0000
drm/i915: Actually flush interrupts on reset not just wedging
Commit 0f36a85c3bd5 ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU
reset") got confused and only applied the flush to the set-wedge path
(which itself is proving troublesome), but we also need the
serialisation on the regular reset path. Oops.
Move the interrupt into reset_irq() and make it common to the reset and
final set-wedge.
v2: reset_irq() after port cancellation, as we assert that
execlists->active is sane for cancellation (and is being reset by
reset_irq).
References: 0f36a85c3bd5 ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a
GPU reset")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
Cc: MichaĆ Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
Link:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180323101824.14645-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180323/c5ea23ed/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list