[Bug 105157] [CI] igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-* - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(busy_r) <= (1.0 + (0.15)) * (double)((double)target_busy_pct / 100.0) && (double)(busy_r) >= (1.0 - (0.15)) * (double)((double)target_busy_pct / 100.0)

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri May 11 21:21:39 UTC 2018


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105157

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #18 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit d502f055ac4500cada758876a512ac4f14b34851
Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 4 10:51:52 2018 +0100

    tests/perf_pmu: Avoid RT thread for accuracy test

    Realtime scheduling interferes with execlists submission (tasklet) so try
    to simplify the PWM loop in a few ways:

     * Drop RT.
     * Longer batches for smaller systematic error.
     * More truthful test duration calculation.
     * Less clock queries.
     * No self-adjust - instead just report the achieved cycle and let the
       parent check against it.
     * Report absolute cycle error.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20180511/0ace024c/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list